Encyclopedia of Opinion
Question
Should corporations have "moral responsibility"?
Position1 of 2
No, corporations shouldn't have moral responsibility
Argument5 of 6

Only a person can have morals

"Moral responsibility" is big business so transparently attempting to seem human-like or good while ultimately missing the entire meaning of the phrase itself. Only an individual can enact in a "moral" way, while a big company cannot possibly inhabit the inner morality of each and every one of its employees.

The argument

For something to have morals, it must be able to separate right from wrong and feel guilt when it does something wrong. To claim that a corporation has some sort of "moral responsibility" completely corrupts the definition of "moral" and takes on humanistic qualities that are not actually present. A corporation does not know right from wrong and cannot feel guilt. Individuals within a corporation can possess their own respective sets of morals, but a corporation is not a sentient entity with an ability to feel things, especially things so intrinsically tied to human emotion and ethics. Therefore, a corporation cannot have morals.

Context

For something or someone to have morals, it must have the ability to know right from wrong. Only people know right from wrong. Therefore, only people can have morals.

Premises

[P1]To have morals, an entity must be able to distinguish right from wrong and feel guilt when it does wrong. [P2] A corporation is not a sentient being; it cannot know right from wrong or feel guilt, even though the individuals within it each have their own morals. [C] Because only a person can have morals, corporations should not have moral responsibility.

Counter-arguments

"Moral responsibility" does not necessarily denote humanistic moral qualities to an entire corporate entity, it just raises the individuals within that corporate structure to a higher moral standard. The people within large companies, especially those towards the top, do have morals and know right from wrong. Moral responsibility should guide them in making decisions regarding the well-being of their customers and their employees. A corporation that is morally responsible teaches its working people right from wrong.

Rejecting the premises

[Rejecting P2] "Moral responsibility" defines the individuals within a corporation acting morally, not the entire corporate entity itself. Individuals can determine right from wrong within the corporate structure, affecting their employees and customers. [Rejecting P3] People can have morals within a corporation, hence that corporation's "moral responsibility."

Framing

Corporations are not people. They therefore cannot hold morals.