This position holds that net-zero carbon is unachievable on current targets. It argues that the world's deep dependency on fossil fuels makes the deadlines unrealistic, and that the divergent, often counter-productive approaches in use mean a change in expectations and method is needed.
Supporting arguments · 2
- The different approaches being employed are counter-productiveNet-zero will supposedly be achieved by cutting emissions of greenhouse gases while using ‘negative emissions technologies’ to take away residual emissions, but these two approaches risk not working in tandem- and NET’s have problems of their own.
- Our dependency on fossil fuels will make net-zero impossibleOver a century's worth of fossil fuel consumption and a widely spread culture of industrial growth around the world means net-zero will require far more radical solutions than what is currently proposed. Our dependence on non-renewables is a tough habit to break.