Encyclopedia of Opinion
Question
Is 3D unnecessary?
Position‹2 of 2

No, 3D is not unnecessary

This position holds that stereoscopic depth is visual information rather than a gimmick: it changes how space, scale and distance are read, and a film composed for it uses that information in ways a flat version cannot reproduce.

Supporting arguments · 2

  1. Depth is information, and some films are composed around it
  2. Dismissing the format confuses bad use with no use