Encyclopedia of Opinion
Question
Has surveillance gone too far?
Position3 of 3

Surveillance is necessary to prevent serious crime

This position holds that surveillance is necessary to prevent serious crime, but only within limits. It argues that surveillance should be deployed solely where genuinely necessary — for fighting crime — striking a balance rather than being abandoned or allowed to run unchecked.

Supporting arguments · 1

  1. Surveillance should only be used for fighting against crime
    Surveillance is crucial for pinning down criminals, and stopping innocent people being blamed for crimes they didn't commit.