- Position1 of 2›
Yes, polygraphs should be allowed in court
This position holds that polygraphs should be admissible in court. It argues that lie detectors help determine a subject's truthfulness and often induce confessions, that they are already used elsewhere in law, and that technology should aid the justice system's search for truth.
Supporting arguments · 4
- The illusion of justice is more powerfulLie-detector tests increase the public faith in the justice system, which creates a more stable, law-abiding society.
- Polygraphs induce confessionsThe test itself is not as important as its ability to induce a confession. Making them admissible in court would put increased pressure on a guilty suspect to provide a full confession.
- Lie detectors workLie detectors can detect falsehoods with an 80-90% accuracy rate.
- Polygraphs are already used in other aspects of lawPolygraph tests have been successfully implemented in other parts of the legal process.