Encyclopedia of Opinion
Question
Is it offensive for sports teams to use Native American mascots?
Position1 of 2›
Yes, it is offensive for sports teams to use Native American mascots
Argument‹5 of 6›

Native American mascots damage young Native Americans' self-esteem

Seeing their culture mocked and laughed at damages the self-esteem of young Native Americans.

The argument

Seeing oneself and one’s ethnic group portrayed in this way fosters a negative view of oneself and one’s community. It also shows society at large that it is socially acceptable to perceive Native Americans in a negative way. This can have far-reaching consequences for the next generation of Native Americans, who will not only have to deal with deep-rooted, harmful stereotypes but will be confronted by a society that deems is perfectly acceptable to harbour negative views of their race. In 2005, the American Psychological Association (APA) called for the ban of Native American mascots, images and personalities in professional and amateur sports. One of their key sticking points was that it harmed young Native people’s self-esteem and social identity. Stephanie Fryberg carried out a study on the way depictions of Native American people in popular culture impact Native American teens. She found that after being subject to images of Chief Wahoo (the Cleveland Indians' mascot) and Chief Illiniwek (mascot for the University of Illinois), Native American teens registered lower ratings of self-esteem. The next generation of Native Americans needs our support, not our mockery. They already have to grapple with issues of social identity and contend with negative stereotypes about their culture and behaviour. Within this context, sports teams using Native American mascots become highly offensive and damaging.

Context

Seeing their culture portrayed in team mascots, as bumbling clumsy entertainers with red faces and wide smiles is damaging to the self-esteem of young Native Americans.

Premises

[P1]Seeing one's ethnic group portrayed as a mascot fosters a negative self-view and signals that society finds negative views of Native Americans acceptable. [P2] The APA called for a ban in 2005, citing harm to young Native people's self-esteem and social identity. [P3] Fryberg's study found Native teens registered lower self-esteem after seeing mascots like Chief Wahoo. [C] Therefore, because Native American mascots damage young Native Americans' self-esteem, it is offensive for sports teams to use them.

Counter-arguments

Defenders of such mascots argue they are intended to honour rather than demean, invoking martial qualities like bravery, and point to some polling that reports many Native Americans do not personally find the names offensive — evidence they say complicates the claim of uniform harm. On this view intent and reception vary, so "offensive" is contested rather than settled. They also question the evidential leap: a single priming study showing lowered self-esteem immediately after exposure to specific images is a limited, laboratory finding, and critics argue it does not establish lasting, population-wide harm. The APA statement, they note, is an advocacy position rather than a neutral measurement of injury.

Rejecting the premises

[Rejecting P2] Critics note the APA's call is an advocacy position, and that survey evidence on whether Native Americans themselves find such mascots offensive is mixed and contested. [Rejecting P3] A study showing lowered self-esteem right after exposure to specific mascots is a limited, lab-based finding; critics question whether it generalises to lasting, population-wide harm.