- Question
Is it offensive for sports teams to use Native American mascots?
Teams like the Washington Redskins, the Atlanta Braves and the Cleveland Indians have always used Native American imagery and mascots in their branding. Advocacy groups accuse them of cultural appropriation and playing on racial slurs. Are their claims justified? Is the use of Native American imagery a sign of respect for their culture? Is their offence justified?
Yes, it is offensive for sports teams to use Native American mascots
This position holds that it is offensive for sports teams to use Native American mascots. It argues that such mascots are a form of racist cultural appropriation — spreading harmful stereotypes, carrying painful historical baggage, and damaging the self-esteem of young Native Americans.
- Native American have historical baggage
- Native American mascots are racist
- Native American mascots are a form of cultural appropriation
- Offence is subjective therefore Native American mascots are not appropriate
- Native American mascots damage young Native Americans' self-esteem
- Native American mascots spread harmful stereotypes
No, it's not offensive for sports teams to have Native American mascots
This position holds that it is not offensive for sports teams to use Native American mascots. It argues that such names and imagery are intended as a mark of respect rather than mockery, that they can be done tastefully, and that many Native Americans are not offended by them.