Encyclopedia of Opinion
Question
What do Christians believe?
Position6 of 7
Quaker Christians
Argument7 of 7

Quakers Clergy

Quakers do not believe a clergy is necessary to communicate with God.

The argument

Quakers believe all human beings can have a direct experience of God - they don't need priests to help them. Therefore, they don't believe in a clergy and feel that all believers can minister to one another. They believe that priests and rituals are an unnecessary obstruction between the believer and God. These groups tend to refer to their congregations as meetings. Though some branches of Quakers do have pastors. These branches tend to have more structure in worship and are more biblically focused. These groups are more likely to refer to their congregations as a church. There is one office in the Quaker religion, which is a clerk. This position is a volunteer position. They are responsible for holding monthly meetings, and communicating to the group as a whole. When their term expires a new clerk is appointed to the position.

Premises

[P1]Quakers believe everyone can experience God directly, so they reject a clergy as an unnecessary obstruction and let all believers minister to one another. [P2] Some more structured, biblically focused branches do have pastors and call their congregations churches rather than meetings. [P3] The one Quaker office is a volunteer clerk, who holds monthly meetings and is replaced when their term expires. [C] Therefore, this rejection of a traditional clergy is among the beliefs of Quaker Christians.

Counter-arguments

Most protestant sects have some form of leadership in their churches. The Quakers however believe that collective unity rather than the leadership of one person. In order to make decisions in a congregation, they have monthly meetings in which ever member has a voice in the decisions that are being made. However, the decisions are made without voting and the clerk senses the unity in the room.

Rejecting the premises

[Rejecting P1] The premise runs together two claims — that everyone can experience God directly, and that priests obstruct that experience — and the second does not follow from the first; several traditions hold both that God is directly accessible and that ordained ministry serves a distinct function. [Rejecting P2] The premise concedes what P1 denies: if some branches ordain pastors, then rejecting a clergy characterises parts of the tradition rather than Quakerism as such, so the argument's second step qualifies its first. [Rejecting P3] A clerk who convenes meetings, discerns the sense of the gathering and records its decisions holds a recognised role with real authority, which sits awkwardly beside the claim that no office stands among believers — what distinguishes it from a minister is that it is unpaid and rotating, not that it is absent.