- Position1 of 3›
CRISPR is ethical under certain conditions
This position holds that CRISPR genome editing is ethical only under certain conditions. Its arguments propose limiting it to somatic (non-inheritable) cells, excluding edits to embryos that cannot consent, and confining its use to treating genuine diseases rather than enhancement.
Supporting arguments · 3
- CRISPR is ethical only when it is used on somatic cellsMany scientists and ethicists have voiced concern over genetically editing reproductive and germ cells. This is because the CRISPR edits would then be inheritable to the children of the individual who has been treated with CRISPR. Since we do not know the long-term effects of CRISPR, we should not allow the effects of CRISPR to be passed on to the next generation. Even if just one person who had their reproductive cells edited with CRISPR chose to reproduce, the entire human gene pool could be radically changed. That change may not be for the better, so it is unethical to allow CRISPR changes to be inherited.
- CRISPR is ethical when it is not used on embryosCRISPR can be used on embryos and on adults. Using CRISPR on embryos will surely have significant impacts on that individual's life and there is no way that we can ask an embryo for consent. Thus, we should only use CRISPR on individuals who can consent.
- CRISPR is ethical only when used to treat diseasesCRISPR has gained popularity for its potential to cure negative genetic conditions, such as sickle cell anemia and cystic fibrosis. Using CRISPR for these purposes does not pose ethical concerns. On the other hand, CRISPR should not be used for "human enhancement," such as using CRISPR to change a child's physical appearance.