This position holds that the state should pay for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's security. It argues the state has a duty to protect its citizens, that royal protection is effectively a birthright, and that the couple's risk of attack makes public funding warranted.
Supporting arguments · 2
- As they are at risk of attack, the state should payHarry and Meghan are at risk of being kidnapped or attacked due to their 'high value' celebrity status. Therefore, the state should pay for their protection.
- Security is a Royal birthrightHaving state-funded security is the right of all Royals, wherever they choose to live. The tragic case of Princess Diana illustrates the dangers of losing security for Royals.