- Position‹2 of 2
Yes, sex education should be taught in schools
This position holds that sex education should be taught in schools. It argues that school is where children build decision-making skills, that not everyone has access elsewhere, and that good sex education cuts unwanted pregnancies and STDs, eases shame and anxiety, and fosters inclusion.
Supporting arguments · 7
- Sex education reduces pregnancies and STDsIn countries where comprehensive sex education (not just abstinance-only programs) are on the curriculum, unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted disease rates fall.
- Sex education creates a more inclusive environmentA comprehensive sex education program that includes LGBTQ+ relationships helps make schools more inclusive.
- Teachers should administer sex educationTeachers have committed their lives to educating children and teens. They can communicate far more effectively than parents.
- Not everyone has access to sex educationTeenagers are always going to have sex. By putting sex education on a curriculum, no child gets left behind and is left vulnerable, without the knowledge to make informed decisions and protect themselves.
- Sex education promotes healthy livingWe teach the importance of exercise, a healthy diet, and good oral hygiene in schools. Why wouldn't we also teach good practices for sexual health?
- Sex education reduces sexual guilt and anxietyMany teenagers face enormous amounts of insecurity and anxiety surrounding sexuality, often leading to long term problems. This is largely caused by misinformation or lack of information about sex. Sex education could easily reduce this problem.
- Parents want sex education in schoolsWhen polled, parents usually support making comprehensive sex education classes part of the curriculum.