- Question
- Should there be a test to vote?
- Position1 of 2›
Yes, there should be tests for voting
This position holds that there should be a test to vote. It argues that requiring voters to demonstrate some understanding of how politics works would make people think more seriously about their choice, reduce uninformed bias, and ultimately benefit the country.
Supporting arguments · 3
- A test for voting reduces political biasEveryone has biased opinions. If people were unbiased when they voted, there could be better political leaders.
- A voting test ensures people know how politics worksIt’s very important to understand how the government works. The government has been rooted in laws and traditions that have been in place for centuries. If someone knew how the government operated, they could appoint people who would best run the country.
- A test for voting lets more mature people voteMaturity is attributed to wisdom and knowledge. Maturity helps companies run better, make peace in society, and improves lives. Voting tests would attract more mature voters for the sake of a better country.