- Position1 of 3›
- Yes, white people should be able to have dreadlocks
- Argument1 of 3›
White people should be able to have dreads because cultures should be shared
The values and material works that come from a specific culture should be accessible to everyone. Material culture—such as artwork, clothing, and even dreadlocks—does not belong only to the originating culture. Culture belongs to any human who acknowledges and appreciates the meaning attached to a cultural symbol.
The argument
If handled correctly, culture should be available to everyone, not one group of people. Sharing different aspects of various cultures is a way to connect people, in turn creating a better-understood world. If white people are able to acknowledge and respect the significance dreadlocks have in minority cultures, then they should be able to have the hairstyle. In Germany, a larger number of white people have dreadlocks. The hairstyle is also more accepted and common among their population. One white German citizen claims to have dreadlocks as a way to be fashionably different from the previous generation. This is not a disrespectful act; it is simply a personal choice.
Premises
Counter-arguments
White people should not be wearing dreadlocks because it takes away an aspect of black culture. It is a form of cultural appropriation since the primary race (in the U.S. and Europe) is white, and they are taking a form of cultural expression away from minority cultures to benefit themselves. There is not an expectation of white people with dreadlocks to be dirty or smoke marijuana but black people with that hairstyle have to be burdened with those stereotypes. Therefore, white people should not have dreadlocks.
Rejecting the premises
[Rejecting P2] White people should not have access to certain aspects of minority cultures.