- Position1 of 2›
- Yes, we should have daylight saving time
- Argument1 of 2›
Daylight saving time reduces energy usage
Partaking in daylight saving time has been shown to reduce energy usage.
The argument
The energy case for Daylight Saving Time rests on moving an hour of daylight into the part of the day when people are awake and active. The reasoning is direct: ideally, the more sunlight there is, the less energy people will use, because instead of turning on lights they can open a window to take advantage of the natural light. Lighting is the clearest instance, but the logic extends to much of what a household does indoors after dark, since the extra hour of sunlight shifts some of that activity back into daylight. A second effect works through behaviour rather than through lighting alone. The added sunlight allows for more outdoor activities, and the substitution runs in an energy-saving direction: with more sunlight during the day, children may opt for a game outside rather than watching TV. What is displaced is indoor entertainment that draws power continuously, and what replaces it draws none. The saving is therefore not only the light that goes unswitched, but the wider cluster of indoor consumption that a dark early evening encourages. The third claim concerns the shape of demand rather than its total. Daylight Saving Time also helps with load smoothing, or separating the energy load across the day. If everyone in the country uses energy at the same time, a tremendous amount of strain is placed on the electrical system, and that system has to be built and maintained for its peak rather than for its average. By shifting when households draw power, Daylight Saving Time allows mass energy usage to be more spread out. This matters even where total consumption is unchanged, because it is the peak that determines how much generating and transmission capacity must be held in reserve.
Context
Daylight Saving Time was officially adopted by most European countries in 1916 and by America in 1918 during World War I. It was originally implemented to save energy.
Premises
Counter-arguments
The concept of Daylight Saving Time was adopted over a century ago. While the amount of energy usage reduction was significant back then, the case isn't quite the same now. The amount of energy saved today is near insignificant. People use energy whether or not the sun is out.
Rejecting the premises
[Rejecting P2] The amount of energy actually saved by Daylight Saving Time is rather insignificant in the present day. There are more efficient ways to reduce energy usage.