argument top image

Is taxation theft?
Back to question

If property rights are justified on consequentialist grounds, they should not be viewed as absolute

Resource scarcity may necessitate some restrictions on individuals' ability to use certain resources. This is often used as a basis for a consequentialist justification of property rights, based on the notion that their absence would lead to social or economic disfunction. However, this leaves the door open to consequentialist justifications for the revocation or violation of property rights in certain situations.
< (3 of 3)

The Argument

Counter arguments


Rejecting the premises


This page was last edited on Sunday, 4 Oct 2020 at 02:31 UTC

Explore related arguments