argument top image

What are the pros and cons of social medias impact on mental health during the coronavirus pandemic?
Back to question

Social media has facilitated communication during the pandemic

The ongoing global pandemic has isolated many from friends and loved ones, creating a rise in individuals experiencing feelings of loneliness and other symptoms of poor mental health. However, it can be argued that social media has facilitated communication during a time of distress. Now more than ever, there is a range of avenues available to people so they can stay connected virtually. Consequently, this enables communities to build a stronger support network during a time of unease and anxiety.

The Argument

In this pandemic, social media has become a lifeline for many, tackling issues of loneliness and isolation, demonstrating why human beings reply on opportunities to connect and socialise with others. Robinson argues that "Human beings are social creatures. We need the companionship of others to thrive in life, and the strength of our connections has a huge impact on our mental health and happiness. Being socially connected to others can ease stress, anxiety, and depression, boost self-worth, provide comfort and joy, prevent loneliness, and even add years to your life. On the flip side, lacking strong social connections can pose a serious risk to your mental and emotional health."

Counter arguments

Particularly during a global pandemic, social media usage can have the counter-argument of becoming overwhelming and interpreted as a negative activity for one's mental health if used extensively.



Rejecting the premises

Further Reading

The Independent: UK Government Website: < >


This page was last edited on Tuesday, 18 Aug 2020 at 07:00 UTC

Explore related arguments