Encyclopedia of Opinion
Question

Is cannibalism ethical?

Cannibalism - the practice of eating human flesh - is illegal in every country on Earth. What does the morality look like if cannibalism is for survival? What about in matters of life and death? Should having the victim's consent impact the way it is viewed?

Position 1 of 3
Read this position →

Forms of cannibalism already exist in mainstream society

This position holds that forms of cannibalism already exist within mainstream society. It points to endocannibalism as a spiritual rite, the consumption of placenta as a modern practice, and the Christian Eucharist as a metaphorical form of cannibalism.

Position 2 of 3
Read this position →

Cannibalism has only been viewed as unethical in recent times

This position holds that cannibalism has only come to be seen as unethical in relatively recent times. It points to the practice's long history across cultures, continents and millennia — once even believed to cure disease — supported by archaeological evidence of past cannibal societies.

Position 3 of 3
Read this position →

It is only ethical when necessary for survival

This position holds that cannibalism is ethical only when survival demands it. It argues that, outside a genuine life-or-death situation, eating human flesh is morally abhorrent — but that when one's own life depends on it, ordinary morality understandably takes a backseat.