- Question
What are the pros and cons of Populism in politics?
2016 established the ascendancy of Populist parties. The UK Brexit vote was soon followed by the election of former property magnate Donald Trump to the US Presidency. In the years since, this political trend has become an even more powerful force. Especially in European democracies. Newer parties are being elected on anti-establishment platforms that threaten the post-war liberal consensus. Whether right-wing or ultra-leftist, populist parties are now setting the political agenda across the continent . What does this mean for Europe's democracies, economies and political landscapes?
Populism is disastrous for politics
This position holds that populism is disastrous for politics. It argues that populism produces worse policy, that it scapegoats minorities to rally support, and that it is fundamentally at odds with the institutions and norms of liberal democracy.
Populism means healthy politics
This position holds that populism is a sign of healthy politics. It argues that its rise shows democracy working — giving voice to large groups long ignored by an elite consensus — and that populist movements have forced neglected issues, including those of the left, onto the mainstream agenda.