Encyclopedia of Opinion
Question

Should university be free?

Should higher education be free to attend? This entry maps the debate, setting out positions that fees should remain, that maintenance loans should rise instead, that funding should target STEM subjects, and that university should be free for all.

Position 1 of 4
Read this position →

No, University fees should remain the same

This position holds that university fees should remain as they are. It argues that free degrees would flood an already saturated graduate market and devalue the credential, that university is a costly premium product its beneficiary should pay for, and that it is a privilege, not a universal right.

Position 2 of 4
Read this position →

Tuition fees should be the same but maintenance loans should be increased

This position holds that tuition fees should stay the same while maintenance loans rise. It argues that tuition, repaid only once a graduate earns above a threshold, barely affects affordability, while maintenance support determines whether a student can cover living costs without part-time work.

Position 3 of 4
Read this position →

Funding should be increased for STEM subjects

This position holds that public funding should be increased specifically for STEM subjects. It argues that reducing or removing the cost of science, technology, engineering and maths degrees would widen access to these essential careers for capable students who might otherwise be priced out.

Position 4 of 4
Read this position →

Yes, University should be free to attend

This position holds that university should be free to attend. It argues that free access would let talent, not family wealth, decide who gets a degree, boosting social mobility, and that with degrees now an effective job requirement, charging heavily for them can no longer be justified.