- Question
Should the U.S. break up into smaller distinct nations?
The United States, the third largest country in the world, spans an entire continent and touches two oceans. A flight from coast to coast takes on average six hours, and a drive takes about 45 hours. It is an enormous place, encompassing dozens of ethnicities, states, ideologies, and dynamics. Such a large place brings with it disagreement, but whether those disagreements are large enough to result in the need for smaller nations is up for debate.
Yes, the US should break into smaller nations
The differences between the regions and states of the United States have become too stark. America is simply too large to achieve cohesion, and if any real progress is to be made in the country, it must change its thinking and become separate countries. This would afford the sharp regional differences to no longer hinder a federal government. Furthermore, there has long been a states’ rights mentality in the United States, to break down a step further is the logical progression. A situation like the European Union may be favorable.
No, the U.S. should remain as a whole
The diversity of the United States is attributed to many things, but a large part may be its size. America finds its strength in its unique situation as a nation of greatly This diversity ensures a type of balance. Strength is not found in similarities, but differences. If nations are formed in what their citizens have in common instead of focusing on building connections in all ways, it is a huge detriment to the strength of country.