- Position‹2 of 3›
- Joe Biden has the better approach to Policing
Joe Biden would reduce the number of prisoners and reduce federal spending on incarceration. "These savings should be reinvested in the communities impacted by mass incarceration."
The argument
Joe Biden believes that there are many people in prisons and jail today that do not belong there. Furthermore, he believes that no one should be incarcerated for a nonviolent crime, such as nonviolent drug crimes. In fact, he wants anyone arrested for a drug problem to go straight to a rehabilitation center, not a prison cell.However, he has stated that there are people that should stay behind bars as they committed horrible crimes, and are a threat to society. This position may come from the fact that there has been a steep rise in incarceration in recent decades. Right now, The United States has more prisoners than any other country in the world, as well as the highest incarceration rate. There are about 2.3 million people in prisons and jails in the U.S. right now. This is more than a 500% increase over the last 40 years.This is due in large part to the types of crime people are being convicted of. Today, there are more people behind bars for drug-related offenses, than the number of people incarcerated for any crime in 1980.
Premises
Counter-arguments
Biden says that he will shrink the US prison population, but Biden is just catering to the leftist political movement for abolishing prisons, and it’s unclear how he would actually implement this plan.
Rejecting the premises
[Rejecting P1] The figure is national, but the overwhelming majority of people in prison are held under state law. A president's direct authority runs to the federal system, a fraction of the total, so the diagnosis and the powers of the office do not line up. [Rejecting P2] Diverting drug cases to treatment is a sentencing and corrections policy. The question asked is about policing, and the premise answers a different one. [Rejecting P3] A commitment is a stated intention. Critics note that the record includes authorship of the 1994 crime legislation associated with the growth in incarceration the premise deplores, which is a reason to ask how the plan would be implemented rather than to treat it as already delivered.