An independent Scotland would threaten British identity

Scotland may like to claim that its unique identity is a reason for independence, but that is what is so special about the Union. England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland offer a diversity of unique—and shared—cultures and histories that demonstrate what is so distinctive about Britain. According to polling, 23 percent of Scots consider themselves only 'Scottish.' The rest also identify with varying degrees of British identity, with nearly half considering themselves at least equally British and Scottish.^[1] In the era of Brexit, the value of identity cannot be understated. Considering that other parts of the UK feel higher levels of 'Britishness,' the loss of Scotland would be devastating. More importantly, a significant proportion of Scotland also sees itself as British. While this may not be a primary identity for some, the interconnectedness of Scotland and its neighbors in the UK is evident. The language, families, food, and entertainment share a long and intricate history. There is no doubt that Scotland has a unique history, culture, and ethos, but that does not necessitate its independence. In an increasingly diverse world, the UK represents an early effort towards that goal. Europe is riding itself on loosening the borders that have caused divisions in the past, so why would Scotland choose to create one with its closest neighbors?^[2]

[P1] Scotland is a part of a broader 'British' identity. [P2] A larger number of Scots consider themselves at least partly British. [P3] Scotland and the rest of the UK have more commonalities than differences. [C] Scotland is vital to the idea of British identity, and its independence would be not only a loss for its fellow Union members but the country itself.