- Position1 of 3›
- Yes, Esports has a legitimate claim at being a sport
The argument
Being officially classed as an athlete can afford people benefits in many countries and organisations. For example, many universities and colleges offer sports scholarships, and some countries have Visas specifically for athletes, such as the US. Considering the loose definition of 'sport', and the fact that Esports athletes train just as hard as traditional athletes, these benefits offer a real-world motivation for classing Esports as a legitimate sport.
Premises
Counter-arguments
That a classification would benefit esports athletes does not show the classification is accurate. Whether esports is a sport should turn on what a sport is, not on the scholarships and visas that recognition would unlock — awarding a label because it yields perks is motivated reasoning, and one could just as easily argue for the perks to be extended to esports competitors through categories that do not require redefining sport. Benefit is a reason to *want* the label, not evidence that it fits.
Rejecting the premises
[Rejecting P3] The benefits could be granted to esports competitors through other classifications, so withholding sport status does not necessarily withhold them without justification. [Rejecting C] Desirable consequences of a label are not evidence that the label is correctly applied.