- Position‹2 of 2
- Disadvantages of year round school
With year round schooling, parents and teachers may have trouble scheduling daycare around their personal work schedules. Planning family or personal trips also would become increasingly difficult with year round schooling.
The argument
Difficulties in scheduling is one of the main concerns of parents and teachers alike with year round schooling. Family vacations and quality time would be severely impacted. The long summer months are when most families spend time together and take meaningful holidays away from school and work. Without this extended break, families no longer have that option. Parents would also have greater difficulty scheduling daycare services for their children. Summer months are predictable and long term daycare can be easily arranged. However, short breaks are less predictable and parents can find it difficult to secure daycare for their children. Without the widespread implementation of year round schooling, daycare options run on the traditional school schedule, which can pose massive problems for families who need daycare for their children every month or so for three weeks at a time under a year round schedule.
Premises
Counter-arguments
If more schools implement year round schooling, more day cares can better accommodate the frequent three-week breaks that working parents need. In addition, schools offer daycare options to parents. Third party sites, including Care.com and nanny sites, provide safe, affordable, and fast daycare services for parents in need.
Rejecting the premises
[Rejecting P1] The premise treats the summer break as the only occasion for family time, but a year-round calendar redistributes the same number of days into several breaks rather than removing them, and no reason is given why holidays cannot be taken in those. It also assumes that a calendar originally built around agricultural labour is the one families prefer, rather than the one they have adapted to. [Rejecting P2] The difficulty described depends on the schedule not being widespread — the premise says so itself — which makes it a cost of transition rather than a property of the model. Provision follows demand, and the counter points to school-run programmes and third-party services that already cover shorter periods.