Encyclopedia of Opinion
Question
Were the moon landings faked?
Position2 of 2
The Apollo missions were faked
Argument2 of 2

The photos are faked

The photos from the moon were actually shot inside a studio

The argument

By analysing the photo taken by NASA in detail, a professional photographer came to the conclusion that there are obvious reasons that these photos are been taken in a studio. Sources indicate that film director Stanley Kubrick might have hired by NASA for doing this since his previous experience with the SD movie "2001 Space Odyssey"

Context

In the frame of a Apollo missions being an hoax, an argument is that there are reasons to believe that photos shown can not have been taken on the Moon.

Premises

[P1]A professional photographer analysing NASA's images concluded they show obvious signs of being taken in a studio. [P2] Some sources claim NASA hired film director Stanley Kubrick, given his experience with the science-fiction film 2001: A Space Odyssey. [P3] If the photographs were staged, the missions they document were too. [C] Therefore, because the photos appear faked, the Apollo moon landings were faked.

Counter-arguments

Professional photographers who examined the photo were not expert on space photos. The analysis was not conducted on the original photo, but a copy that has been already modified. Digital photography was not available in the 70s; therefore photo manipulation techniques were much less sophisticated.

Rejecting the premises

The counter-arguments to this objection are: 1) The flag had a special horizontal rod to keep it standing; oscillations were due to some inertia, 2) The stars are not showing due to high luminosity of Moon surface