argument top image

Should we legalize all drugs?
Back to question

Prohibition does not work

There is no way to win the war against illegal drugs, except by not fighting it.

The Argument

Spending on drug enforcement in the United States skyrocketed beginning in the late 1980s, accumulating to over 1.5 trillion dollars spent fighting drugs by U.S. agencies between the 1980s and 2010. Despite the aggressive and well-funded efforts of the world's wealthiest nation, U.S. drug addiction rates did not change significantly over the same time period, and the National Survey on Drug Use and Health determined that in 2017, approximately 38% of American adults had used illicit drugs. The lesson of history is clear: just as prohibition did not work for alcohol in the early 20th century, it does not work for illicit drugs in the 21st century. Increasing public recognition of the failures of drug enforcement strategies have led to a decline in popular support for the U.S. war on drugs and calls for a new approach. The widespread use of illicit drugs is a fait accompli that legal authorities have proven unable to stop or even slow, which makes legalization and regulation the logical next step.

Counter arguments



[P1] The US war on drugs has failed to curb drug use. [P2] It is time to try a new tactic: legalisation.

Rejecting the premises


This page was last edited on Thursday, 5 Mar 2020 at 17:20 UTC

Explore related arguments