- Argument‹2 of 2
Abdul-Jabbar was the greatest collegiate player of all time
The history of U.S. college basketball is as storied as that of the NBA, and Abdul-Jabbar (then Lew Alcindor) was college basketball's greatest champion.
The argument
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, known as Lew Alcindor during his college years, had already accomplished an all time great basketball career before he ever played in the NBA. The claim is not that his professional record is beside the point, but that the college years alone constitute an achievement no other player matches, and that a case for the best player of all time can be built on them. The record begins immediately. Starting on the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) freshman basketball team in 1966, Alcindor set the single-game scoring record for the school in his very first game. Once eligible to play on the upper class team in 1967, he went on to win national championships all three years he played (1967-1969). Sustained dominance of that kind is the hardest thing to achieve in college basketball, where rosters turn over every year and a single defeat ends a tournament run; winning every season he was eligible means he never lost when it counted. The individual honours track the team results exactly: he was named a First Team All-American all three years, the Most Outstanding Player of the NCAA championship tournament all three years, and the national player of the year twice out of three years each by the Associated Press, the United States Basketball Writers Association, and Sporting News. There is a further measure that almost no player supplies at all. Alcindor's impact on college basketball was so enormous that he even changed the rules: his dunking was so dominant in 1967 that the move was banned for the next decade. When a governing body alters the game itself in response to one player, it concedes that ordinary competition could not contain him. Many great professional players have played under the NCAA system, but Kareem Abdul-Jabbar stands above them all for his achievements at the college level.
Premises
Counter-arguments
Critics reply that unmatched college dominance is a strong credential but the wrong measure: "best player of all time" is judged overwhelmingly on the professional career, so a rival can concede Kareem's UCLA supremacy and still rank Jordan or others higher overall. College honours do not settle a pro-era debate. They add that leaning on the college record understates Abdul-Jabbar's own best case, which is his NBA achievement — all-time leading scorer for decades, six championships and six MVPs. That no professional great matches his college résumé is largely because dominant players leave college quickly, so it says little about their standing as players.
Rejecting the premises
[Rejecting P1] Unmatched college achievement is one credential, but "best of all time" is judged overwhelmingly on the professional career, where the comparison with Jordan and Russell is decided. [Rejecting P3] That no pro great matches his college record is largely because dominant players leave college early, so it says little about their relative standing as players.