Encyclopedia of Opinion
Question
What is dark matter?
Position1 of 4
Dark matter is made of Baryonic matter
Argument

Dark matter is made of tiny black holes

Stephen Hawking in 1974 predicted that dark matter goes back to the big bang and is made of black holes. Since then, scientists have been investigating this theory.

The argument

Scientists postulated that dark matter can be made of big or tiny black holes. Research has discovered massive black holes millions to billions times the size of the sun. These black holes are the easiest to detect because of their large size. Theoretically, there are many smaller black holes that formed after the big bang but are undetectable due to their small size. Scientists predicted that dark matter can be made of the massive black holes, the tiny black holes, or a combination of the two. The data on massive black holes did not support the hypothesis that dark matter can be made of big black holes because of their scarcity. Tiny black holes are still candidates of what constitute dark matter. Dark matter is made of tiny black holes and research on dark matter should focus on discovering them.

Premises

[P1]Scientists have proposed that dark matter could be composed of massive black holes, tiny black holes, or a combination of both. [P2] Observational data shows massive black holes are too scarce to account for dark matter, ruling them out as the primary constituent. [P3] Tiny black holes formed after the Big Bang remain viable candidates because their small size makes them undetectable yet potentially abundant. [C] Therefore, dark matter is made of tiny black holes, and research should focus on detecting them.

Counter-arguments

Most modern scientists disprove the theory of black holes as a component of dark matter. Scientists conducted experiments involving the detection of gravitational lensing: the phenomenon of light bending as an object like a black hole moves past another due to gravity. Gravitational lensing results in an increase in brightness of nearby stars which researchers can detect. If an increase in brightness of nearby stars is detected, then a black hole has passed. Scientists predicted to see 1000 brightening events if dark matter is made of black holes. Scientists detected only one event. The results showed that black holes can contribute no more than 0.1% of dark matter. It is highly unlikely that black holes make up dark matter.

Rejecting the premises

[Rejecting P1] Accurate as a description of what has been proposed, but the premise sets up a false choice. Primordial black holes are one candidate among several — weakly interacting massive particles, axions and sterile neutrinos among them — so ruling out one option does not leave the other standing as the answer. [Rejecting P2] Correct, and the same class of observation constrains the small end too. Microlensing surveys look for the brightening of a background star as a compact object passes in front of it; a population of primordial black holes sufficient to account for dark matter predicted on the order of a thousand such events, and one was detected, bounding their contribution to roughly 0.1 per cent. [Rejecting P3] Undetectability is not a point in the hypothesis's favour. A candidate is supported by evidence for it, not by the absence of evidence against it — and small black holes are not in fact unobservable, being constrained by lensing surveys, by the cosmic microwave background and, at the smallest masses, by the evaporation the theory itself predicts. The premise treats difficulty of refutation as a reason for acceptance.