The UK controversial statues debate is about the decline of the West
This battle over whether or not to take down controversial statues is really a proxy for a larger battle about the decline of Western authority in geopolitics.
<
(4 of 7)
Next argument >
The Argument
The Deline of the West is a 2 volume book and thesis on the cycle of civilizations throughout history, published in 1918 and 1922.[1] He argues that Western civilization has passed its Cultural stage and is now in a stage of decay. [2] This point is driven home by one of his beliefs that once a civilization has reached its stage of decay, it will embark on a crusade to put forth its moral code on the people of the world.[3] This would explain the tearing down of statues by not only protestors but the government alike. [4] We must focus on avoiding this period of decay, rather than perpetuating the cycle.
Counter arguments
Oswald Spengler’s thesis on current Western civilization can not be considered as a philosophical issue of today, because he was not only wrong about the “inevitable path” of 2 of the 8 cultures referenced in his books, he also argued that Western civilization is already in decline at the time of writing these books, which were published 100 years ago.[5]
Proponents
Premises
Rejecting the premises
References
- https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3096566/west-decline
- https://faculty.webster.edu/corbetre/personal/reading/spengler-decline.html
- https://faculty.webster.edu/corbetre/personal/reading/spengler-decline.html
- https://www.lancaster.gov.uk/news/2020/jul/revealing-our-past-council-looks-to-reveal-district-s-hidden-history
- https://faculty.webster.edu/corbetre/personal/reading/spengler-decline.html