- Position‹5 of 5
- A minimum wage is ineffective at reducing poverty
- Argument‹4 of 4
The minimum wage doesn't address underemployment.
Underemployment is a far larger driver of poverty. A minimum wage does nothing to address underemployment.
The argument
Only 7% of families living in conditions of poverty in the US have a family member that works full time. This means that policies affecting a minimum wage have limited impact on 93% of the families living below the national poverty line.
Context
For many families, it is not low wages that contribute to conditions of poverty, but underemployment.
Premises
Counter-arguments
Implementing or increasing a legal minimum wage spurs job creation through increased demand. This might bring more adults into the workforce and allow for more families living in poverty to secure full-time work. Therefore, the assertion that policies governing a minimum wage would do little to lift families out of unemployment is incorrect.
Rejecting the premises
[Rejecting P2] Policies affecting a minimum wage create jobs, reducing unemployment and underemployment.
Framing
Underemployment is a larger driver of poverty than low wages.