Encyclopedia of Opinion
Question
Should there be a tax on sugar?
Position‹3 of 3
It is difficult to tax a sugar
Argument

It is unclear what is considered 'sugar'

When people say sugar the first thing that comes to mind is table sugar, then sweets, fruit, candy, and so on. All of these contain sugar so if sugar is tax would the tax be restrained to a tax, or would it include all things that contain sugar. The question is how drastic would the tax be?

The argument

Sugar is commonly classed as a commodity. This means that it's an agricultural product. Usually produce and such is exempt from most taxes besides the general filing taxes. As a commodity though, how would it be taxed and in what category? Would the tax be placed on production or only during purchase? Would it be taxed like tobacco due to its sometimes addictive properties? Or would sugar be taxed during sales after it's been turned into consumable foods? These are the questions you have to ask when it comes to both the idea and receiving permission for taxing sugar. There have to be limits and clear laws for how to go about it. Also, with sugars high popularity, the populace could very well react poorly. Much like how the Americans did to the heightened tax on tea back in 1773 with the Boston Tea Party. It would be different if sugar was nutrient as a vegetable or truly mind altering like marijuana but it's not. It's nutrient as as iceberg lettuce and as mind altering as chocolate. Sugar though can make wonderful sweet treats. It's so versatile as a substance that taxing it, while beneficial, is extremely confusing.

Premises

[P1]Sugar is classed as a commodity, usually exempt from most taxes, raising unclear questions about whether to tax it at production or purchase, like tobacco, or only once turned into consumable foods. [P2] Unlike a nutritious food or a truly mind-altering substance, sugar occupies an ambiguous category, and its popularity could provoke a public backlash akin to the Boston Tea Party. [C] Therefore, because it is unclear what counts as 'sugar' and how to categorise it for taxation, it is difficult to tax sugar.

Counter-arguments

For most, taxes aren't the easiest to understand. This is partially because taxes are done by percents. For example, let's say the sales tax is about 7%, and you bought a shirt worth $50.00. The percent is then calculated to a decimal (.07) and multiples by the cost. So, 50 X.07= 3.50. Then add that to the original price, $50.00 + $3.50 = $53.50. The thing that complicates this is that taxes vary from state to state and nation to nation. With America, unlike other countries, tax is not added in the price of what you're buying. Not every item has a sale tax either, like with groceries. All of these factors just continue to further complicates the process. Whether or not sugar is taxed or what tax is placed is not the problem but the system over complicates it. Once it’s simplified not only will there be a better understanding of why the tax is in place but also what’s really happening with peoples money.

Rejecting the premises

[RP1] The tax system is unnecessarily complicated and confusing

Further reading

History.com: The Boston Tea Party