Encyclopedia of Opinion
Question
Is the wellness industry racist?
Position1 of 2
Yes, the wellness industry is racist
Argument3 of 5

There is a history of racism in westernised wellness culture

Yes, the wellness industry is racist because there is a history of racism in westernised wellness countries. Many BIPOC wellness practitioners and teachers have spoken openly about being tokenised and facing open racism within the wellness community, and cultural appropriation forms a large part of the problem.

The argument

Racism has been prevalent across the wellness industry for a number of years. Many BIPOC wellness practitioners and teachers have spoken openly about being tokenised and facing open racism within the wellness community. A large part of the problem stems from cultural appropriation within the industry. For example, there is a deep misunderstanding of the ancient spiritual practice of yoga. It is often associated with white, thin, able-bodied, middle class women, and has been commercialised for western consumers. As a result, much of its cultural meaning has been stripped away.

Premises

[P1]Many BIPOC wellness practitioners and teachers report being tokenised and facing open racism within the wellness community. [P2] Cultural appropriation is central, as with yoga — an ancient spiritual practice commercialised and reframed around white, thin, able-bodied, middle-class women, stripping away its cultural meaning. [C] Therefore, given this history of racism in westernised wellness culture, the wellness industry is racist.

Counter-arguments

The evidence offered establishes that racism occurs within the wellness sector; the position requires that the sector as such is racist, and the gap between those claims is where the argument is weakest. Testimony from practitioners about tokenism and mistreatment is serious and documents real conduct by particular employers, studios and brands. It does not by itself show a structural feature of an industry, and the same standard applied to almost any Western sector would return the same verdict, which drains the claim of the specificity it is trying to assert. The appropriation case is also narrower than it looks. Commercial wellness has commodified a great many traditions — Nordic bathing, Japanese forest practice, European folk herbalism, Indigenous ceremony — which suggests an industry that flattens whatever it markets rather than one animated by racial hierarchy specifically. The history of yoga's global spread complicates the framing further: its international transmission was actively promoted from India by teachers who sought Western students, and the modern postural forms now sold in Western studios were themselves shaped in that exchange. Critics of the appropriation frame argue that describing this as theft understates the agency of the Indian teachers who exported it. None of this defends tokenism. It distinguishes documented racism within an industry from the stronger claim that the industry is racist.

Rejecting the premises

[Rejecting P1] Testimony of tokenism and mistreatment documents conduct by particular employers and brands; establishing that racism occurs within a sector is not the same as establishing that the sector is racist. [Rejecting P2] Commercial wellness commodifies traditions of many origins, which points to indiscriminate marketing rather than racial hierarchy, and yoga's global transmission was actively promoted by Indian teachers seeking Western students.