What are the options on a second Brexit referendum?

This position holds that there should not be a second Brexit referendum. It argues that the public has already spoken in the first vote, that re-running it would undermine democracy by overturning a settled decision, and that another campaign would only deepen national division.

This position holds that debating a second Brexit referendum is irrelevant. It argues such a vote is simply not feasible—there is no time to hold one—and that what the country actually needs is a general election rather than another referendum on Brexit.

This position holds that there should be a second Brexit referendum, in Britain's best interests. It argues that only a fresh vote can settle the debate, that the Leave campaign's conduct undermined the legitimacy of the first, and that the electorate that voted in 2016 is itself changing.

This position proposes a second Brexit referendum offering a choice between Theresa May's deal and a hard Brexit. It argues that the public voted to leave but not on what kind of Brexit, and that — with politicians deadlocked — only a fresh vote can settle the terms.

This position proposes a second Brexit referendum offering a choice between Theresa May's deal and cancelling Brexit altogether. It argues that now the actual deal is known, voters deserve a say on it, that opinion has shifted, and that a no-deal exit would be the worst outcome of all.

This position proposes a second Brexit referendum with every option on the ballot — May's deal, a no-deal Brexit, and remaining in the EU. It argues that only a vote representing all opinions can break the political deadlock that paralysed Parliament.