Society

The marketplace of ideas is no longer relevant. The concept served its purpose; to raise the issue of government accountability.

An unregulated market of ideas disproportionately benefits a select few. In this way it supports social hierarchy and prevents those at the bottom from changing their circumstances.

The idea falsely assumes that making emotional arguments is enough to change people's minds on an issue. This is simply incorrect.

If it worked, society would not repeat its mistakes. That alone is proof that the idea has no legs to stand on.

Intersectionality is not the new caste system because it provides a better understanding of the multidimensional impact of race, class, and gender on social status. It provides a way of acknowledging that identity is multidimensional and often has more than one attribute or social category.

If each society were homogeneous in its culture, people would never be exposed to other traditions. When heterogeneity is introduced in a society, people witness differences between their own culture and others. This inspires an appreciation for one's own culture, an interest and curiosity to learn about others, and a powerful social dynamic of group interaction.

Research shows that people now make assumptions about other people and their personalities, based on their emojis use.

No environment exists free from bias. Therefore the very assumption it is based upon is flawed.

Online bias is sabotaging the free exchange of ideas. There is no such thing as impartiality on the internet.

The marketplace of ideas has been used in countless legal cases to defend free speech. The marketplace of ideas has impacted the rules by which we live.

Political correctness defines the boundaries of our society and ensures the safety of minority groups

Many cultures compile their own stockpile of knowledge, whether it be old wives' tales or medicinal tricks. With multiculturalism, many more people would have these valuable tips at their disposal.