argument top image

Does the marketplace of ideas work?
Back to question

The marketplace of ideas works, but is compromised

Online bias is sabotaging the free exchange of ideas. There is no such thing as impartiality on the internet.
Ethics Marketplace of Ideas Philosophy Politics Society

The Argument

The growth of online cancel culture and rampant collegiate de-platforming are symptomatic of how the marketplace of ideas is under threat. From author J.K. Rowling to pioneering feminist Germaine Greer, those whose views question the prevailing social narrative are excluded by society, and denied the opportunity to share their views. This aversion to debate has fostered a generation of young adults incapable of critical analysis.[1] Some claim this is a direct result of an increasingly authoritarian tendency within mainstream media. One that undermines popular opinions and stimulates a culture of fear that discourages people from disagreement.[2] In both cases, the marketplace of ideas is compromised. Robbed of unpopular arguments, and fed only an established dogma, the public is increasingly misled and starved, incapable of making an informed decision.

Counter arguments

An intellectual environment where the privileged can share their views without ever having face criticism represents elite monopoly, not freedom of speech. Protest is an essential component of freedom of speech. The cancelling of public figures generates healthy debate and open dialogue on controversial issues. Such instances do not harm the marketplace of ideas; they are the marketplace of ideas.



Rejecting the premises


This page was last edited on Monday, 26 Oct 2020 at 14:55 UTC

Explore related arguments