- Position‹2 of 4›
- Legislative Powers (Article II, Section 3)
- Argument‹3 of 3
Convene and adjourn Congress
This power has been used to legislate anything from nominations to war declarations to emergency management. Not only can the president adjourn Congress in states of emergency, but this power may also be utilized to bring members to the table when chambers disagree on when to adjourn.
The argument
The Constitution states that the President "may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper." with the provision that "Neither House, during the session of Congress, shall, without the consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days... (art. I, § 5,cl. 4)"
Premises
Counter-arguments
A classification objection holds that convening Congress on extraordinary occasions, or adjourning it in the rare case of disagreement between the houses, is an exceptional procedural provision rather than a genuine legislative power. The President still cannot make law; this is influence over Congress's schedule, and arguably functions more as an executive check on the legislature than as participation in legislating. It adds that the adjournment power in particular has almost never been used, making it a latent constitutional provision rather than a substantive lawmaking authority — and the citation itself mixes Article II, Section 3 (the power) with Article I, Section 5 (the three-day limit), which underscores that the clause regulates procedure rather than vesting the executive with legislative power.
Rejecting the premises
[Rejecting P1] Convening or adjourning Congress is a rare, exceptional procedural power, not the making of law, so classifying it as a 'legislative power' of the executive overstates it. [Rejecting P2] It functions more as an executive check on the legislature's schedule than as the President participating in legislation. [Rejecting P3] The adjournment clause has almost never been used, so it is a latent constitutional provision rather than a substantive lawmaking power vested in the President.