- Question
Should human cloning be banned?
Cloning is the creation of a genetic copy of a sequence of DNA or of the entire genome of an organism. In the cloning debate, the term ‘cloning’ typically refers to a technique called somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). SCNT involves transferring the nucleus of a somatic cell into an oocyte form, where most of the DNA has been removed. The manipulated oocyte is then treated with an electric current in order to stimulate cell division, resulting in the formation of an embryo. The embryo is (virtually) genetically identical to, and thus a clone of the somatic cell donor. The debate revolves around human integrity, power, and social order.
Yes, human cloning should be banned
This position holds that human cloning should be banned. It argues the practice endangers social order and human integrity, that it is medically unsafe and unethical, and that it could give rise to a new form of racism based on genetic origins.
No, human cloning should not be banned
This position holds that human cloning should not be banned. It argues that if people have a right to reproduce, society has no business restricting the means — and that cloning is not so different from accepted technologies like IVF, offering another route to starting a family.