- Position1 of 2›
- Women should vote for Trump
The argument
Trump named the first woman to head the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and had women serving as Secretaries of Education, Transportation and Homeland Security. The Trump Administration also has over 300 women serving in politically appointed roles as judges and ambassadors.
Premises
Counter-arguments
Only 3 women hold cabinet positions in the Trump administration of the 23 spots available, making it the lowest number of females holding appointments in the White House at the same time since George Bush’s presidency. The Trump administration also disbanded the White House Council on Women and Girls in 2017. The council was created by Barack Obama to ensure political agencies consider the needs of women and girls when policies are drafted. This programme has not been replaced by anything relating to gender inequality since being disbanded.
Rejecting the premises
[Rejecting P1] The appointments are listed accurately, but no comparison is offered. Cabinet-level appointments of women were made by preceding administrations of both parties, and without a baseline the list shows only that some women were appointed. [Rejecting P2] "Over 300 women in politically appointed roles" is given with no source and no denominator. An administration makes several thousand political appointments, so a raw count cannot show whether women were well or poorly represented — the counter-argument's figure of three of twenty-three Cabinet posts is exactly the comparison this premise omits. [Rejecting P3] This is the weakest step: appointments made are read as a general commitment to women's advancement, while the sibling position contests the record on policy rather than on personnel. The counter-argument's example — the disbanding of the White House Council on Women and Girls without replacement — is the kind of evidence this inference would have to survive, and it is not addressed.