Encyclopedia of Opinion
Question

Should books be adapted into movies?

We’ve seen many of our favourite stories rise to the silver screen. From childhood favourites like Harry Potter to remakes of classics like Little Women, many books have been adapted into screenplays and made into movies. The big dilemma: read the book, or watch the movie? Should the movie adaptation even exist at all?

Position 1 of 3
Read this position →

Books should be adapted into movies

This position holds that books should be adapted into movies. It argues adaptations give a story a visual, artistic form, offer an alternative for those who prefer or cannot read, boost the original book's popularity, and give filmmakers creative room to reinterpret the material.

Position 2 of 3
Read this position →

Books should not be adapted into movies

This position holds that books should not be adapted into films. It argues that a film can never fully capture its source, that adaptations can overshadow and even spoil the reputation of the book, and that they rob readers of the joy of imagining the story for themselves.

Position 3 of 3
Read this position →

Books and movies are incomparable

This position holds that books and their film adaptations are incomparable. It argues that an adaptation is a new work of art merely inspired by the book, judged by wholly different criteria — so the two should not be ranked against each other at all.