- Question
- When will coronavirus end?
- Argument‹3 of 3
Global distancing efforts will continue
Studies have shown that individuals all over the world are implementing personal protective measures. There are no signs those measures will stop as the numbers overall continue to decline.
The argument
One of the biggest concerns from scientists and researchers regarding the future of COVID-19 is the public's ability to distance. The UK locked down much later than other countries because of the notion that people would grow tired of social distancing measures and a peak would rise. However, according to research from the MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis at Imperial College London, this has not been the case. The MRC survey—published in June—found that a large portion of the population in the 53 countries that had eased lockdown restrictions was still practicing social distancing and personal health measures. Experts agree that social distancing measures—wearing masks, washing hands, staying six feet apart from others—are some of the best ways to combat the pandemic, and the public is by and large abiding by these measures. The New York Times found over 50 percent of people said they wore masks in 13 of 21 countries, including the U.S., Italy, Japan, and Germany. Social distancing measures—which scientists assumed would peter off—are continuing to thrive. Given the steady downward trend in daily new infections in countries ransacked by the virus—the United States in particular—the pandemic will be over by July if the public continues to practice social distancing measures. They have, and there have been no signs of stopping.
Premises
Counter-arguments
Relying on distancing metrics from the past does not tell us anything about the future. The public's ability to keep social distancing efforts going in the seven months since the start of the pandemic is great, but with some studies estimating that distancing efforts will continue until 2022, the future is hard to predict.
Rejecting the premises
[Rejecting P1] A survey published in June 2020 records behaviour at one early moment. The conclusion concerns the following year, and adherence measured before vaccine rollout, before lockdown fatigue set in and before official guidance shifted cannot simply be extrapolated forward. [Rejecting P2] Self-reported mask wearing is not the same as sustained distancing, and a bare majority in 13 of 21 countries is a thin base for a claim about the course of a global pandemic. [Rejecting P3] The inference is the weakest step. Continued distancing plus a downward trend in one period does not yield an end date, and no epidemiological reasoning is offered to connect them. The counter-argument notes that other estimates ran to 2022 — and the argument's own title claims only that distancing will continue, while the position it supports asserts the pandemic would be over by July 2021.